Write It Down Instead of Trusting Memory

Introduction

Self-improvement becomes easier to judge when progress leaves a record. “I was fairly consistent this month” is an impression; a calendar with twelve completed sessions, six missed sessions and the dates of each is information. That distinction matters because memory is not a neutral ledger. Retrospective reports are vulnerable to forgetting, reconstruction and other recall biases, particularly when people are trying to summarise repeated behaviour over days or weeks. Research methods designed to capture experience close to the time it happens were developed partly to reduce precisely this problem.[PubMed]pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govPub Med Ecological momentary assessmentEcological momentary assessment - PubMed…

There is also evidence that recording progress can do more than improve recollection. A large meta-analysis of experimental studies found that interventions which increased progress monitoring improved goal attainment, with stronger effects when the information was physically recorded rather than merely monitored without a record. The practical lesson is modest but useful: do not make memory the sole authority on whether the plan is working. Create a small, visible record that can settle the question.[PubMed]pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govDoes monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence - PubMedFebruary 1, 2016…Published: February 1, 2016

Why memory gives weak feedback

The problem with relying on memory is not simply that people occasionally forget individual events. Self-improvement usually requires reconstructing a pattern: How often did I exercise? Have I really been studying four evenings a week? Is my spending improving, or did this week merely feel better? The longer and more repetitive the period, the more the answer depends on summarising many similar episodes after the fact.

Research comparing retrospective reports with measurements made closer to events shows why that is risky. Reviews of physical-activity measurement, for example, find that questionnaire-based reports can overestimate or underestimate activity and are affected by inaccurate recollection and response biases. Studies comparing self-reported exercise with device records have likewise found discrepancies, including tendencies towards over-reporting.[PubMed Central (PMC)]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govPubMed Central (PMC)A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review - P…

The relevant comparison is not “memory is useless, records are perfect”. Records can also be wrong. The useful distinction is between reconstructing behaviour later and capturing evidence nearer to the event. Ecological momentary assessment, a research approach that repeatedly records what people are doing or experiencing in daily life, exists partly because shorter recall periods can reduce the distortions associated with global retrospective reports. A 2022 systematic review found that the accuracy of such momentary self-reports still varied substantially between behaviours and studies, so contemporaneous recording should not be treated as objective truth. It simply removes one important source of uncertainty: having to remember an entire period afterwards.[PubMed Central (PMC)]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govPubMed Central (PMC)Ecological Momentary Assessment: A Systematic Review of Validity Research - PMC…

That changes the quality of personal feedback. Suppose someone intends to practise a language five days a week. At the end of a disappointing month, “I think I practised most days” offers little guidance. A record showing 17 sessions, with most omissions on Fridays and weekends, reveals a different problem: the weekday system may be working reasonably well while the weekend plan is failing. The record does not merely issue a verdict. It shows where the next decision belongs.

This is why written tracking is best understood as a small governance mechanism for personal behaviour. It establishes a rule about evidence: when judging progress, use recorded occurrences rather than whichever weeks happen to be easiest to remember.

Physical records can strengthen the effect

The strongest broad evidence comes from Benjamin Harkin and colleagues’ meta-analysis of 138 experimental studies involving 19,951 participants. Interventions designed to increase the monitoring of goal progress produced a moderate improvement in goal attainment overall, and increases in monitoring statistically mediated the improvement. Crucially for written records, the researchers found larger effects when participants physically recorded the information they obtained from monitoring: the reported effect on goal attainment was about d=0.43 with recording versus d=0.29 without it. The difference remained when goal attainment itself was measured objectively.[PubMed]pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govDoes monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence - PubMedFebruary 1, 2016…Published: February 1, 2016

“Physically recorded” should not be read as “paper is scientifically superior to a phone”. In this research, the important contrast was between creating a persistent record and merely checking progress without recording it. The authors suggested that a stored record allows people to examine progress over time and identify actions that help or hinder the goal.[ResearchGate]researchgate.netOpen source on researchgate.net.

That interpretation fits the wider behaviour-change literature. The widely used Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy treats “self-monitoring of behaviour” as a distinct intervention component: establishing a way for a person to monitor and record their own behaviour as part of a change strategy. It is grouped with feedback and monitoring rather than with inspiration or general goal setting because its practical role is to make performance observable.[PubMed]pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govThe behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the…

A record turns progress into something inspectable

Once behaviour has been recorded, several questions become answerable without reconstructing the past from memory:

This does not require elaborate data analysis. In many cases the most useful information is binary: done or not done. Someone trying to read each evening may gain more from thirty boxes on a sheet of paper than from a sophisticated dashboard recording pages, reading speed, mood, genre and time of day. The purpose is not to produce impressive data. It is to prevent vague recollection from overruling visible evidence.

There is another possible effect: measurement itself can influence behaviour. A 2022 systematic review of digital, in-the-moment health measurements found small but meaningful evidence of “measurement reactivity” — behaviour changing partly because it is being measured. Proposed mechanisms include greater awareness of the behaviour and noticing discrepancies between actual and desired performance. Earlier reviews also found that asking people questions about their behaviour can sometimes change what they subsequently do, although effects are heterogeneous and the evidence is not clean enough to predict when this will happen.[PubMed]pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govOpen source on nih.gov.

For self-improvement, that is not necessarily a flaw. If marking each workout makes the intended behaviour more salient, the record is functioning partly as an intervention. But it does mean that “tracking” should not be imagined as perfectly passive observation.

Choosing a recording method

The best recording system is not the one that captures the most variables. It is the one likely to be completed accurately enough, for long enough, to support decisions.

Paper calendars, notebooks, spreadsheets, phone notes, habit-tracking apps and automatic device logs can all create persistent evidence. Reviews of weight-management studies have found paper diaries, internet tools, handheld devices and electronic scales all used for self-monitoring, while more recent evidence suggests that digital methods often — though not universally — produce higher engagement than paper methods. In one systematic review comparing digital and paper self-monitoring across weight-loss trials, digital tracking showed better engagement in 19 of 34 comparisons, no difference in 11 and worse engagement in four.[PubMed Central (PMC)]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govOpen source on nih.gov.

The important design choices are therefore less about the prestige of the tool than about the rules governing the record.

Record the behaviour that is actually under your control. If the plan is “study for 30 minutes”, record whether the study session happened. Recording only an eventual exam result gives little day-to-day information about whether the behaviour is being executed. Harkin and colleagues found a useful matching pattern: monitoring behaviour had particularly strong effects on behavioural measures, while monitoring outcomes had stronger effects on outcomes.[ResearchGate]researchgate.netOpen source on researchgate.net.

Record near the event. A tick immediately after a walk is less dependent on recall than trying to reconstruct the week’s walks on Sunday night. Research on momentary assessment consistently identifies reduced reliance on retrospective memory as one of the method’s main advantages.[PubMed]pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govPub Med Ecological momentary assessmentEcological momentary assessment - PubMed…

Keep the entry cheaper than the behaviour. If logging a fifteen-minute practice session requires five minutes of data entry, the monitoring system has become a second project. Reviews of digital self-monitoring repeatedly report declining engagement over time, and the burden of recording is one reason simpler or more automated methods can be attractive.[PubMed Central (PMC)]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govOpen source on nih.gov.

Do not fill gaps from optimistic memory. A missing entry should normally remain missing or be marked as uncertain rather than automatically converted into success. One striking diary study illustrates the danger. Chronic-pain participants using paper diaries reported completing entries at roughly 90% of scheduled times, but an instrumented binder showed actual on-time compliance of only 11%; on many days the binder had not been opened even though diary cards were later completed. An electronic diary that time-stamped entries achieved much higher verified compliance. The study involved a demanding research protocol rather than ordinary habit tracking, so its percentages should not be generalised casually, but it demonstrates how easily a retrospective reconstruction can masquerade as a contemporaneous record.[BMJ]bmj.comOpen source on bmj.com.

Decide in advance what counts. “Went to the gym” is ambiguous if ten minutes on a treadmill counts one day but not another. A useful recording policy defines the unit before motivation or disappointment can renegotiate it: for example, “20 minutes or more of planned exercise”, “one completed practice set”, or “no discretionary purchase today”. Consistent definitions make weeks comparable.

Use the record to govern the next decision

A record becomes valuable when it changes what happens next. Merely accumulating ticks, streaks or graphs can become another form of self-observation without correction.

A simple review rule is enough: inspect the record at a fixed interval and make changes only from the pattern it shows. If the target is four study sessions per week and the last four weeks show four, three, four and four, the system probably does not need reinvention because one session felt unproductive. If the record shows one, two, one and two, repeated recommitment is weaker evidence than the obvious conclusion that something in the plan needs redesigning.

This is where written records improve self-improvement most directly. They create continuity between past action and future policy. Instead of allowing today’s mood to determine whether the programme is “going well”, the person can ask narrower questions: What happened? How often? Where are the misses concentrated? What single change would address that pattern?

The same principle guards against the opposite error: treating a streak as sacred. Records are evidence, not trophies. If an exercise log shows ten consecutive sessions but persistent pain, or a study tracker shows perfect attendance with no meaningful practice being completed, preserving the streak is not the governing objective. The record should remain subordinate to the underlying purpose.

Nor should the system become excessively detailed. Research on self-monitoring shows substantial variation in adherence, and engagement often declines during longer interventions. A record that nobody wants to maintain soon loses its advantage over memory.[PubMed Central (PMC)]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govOpen source on nih.gov.

The practical policy is therefore deliberately small: define what counts, record it close to the event, preserve misses as well as successes, and review the pattern at intervals long enough to reveal something useful. The aim is not perfect measurement. It is to make statements such as “I have been pretty consistent” answerable by something better than recollection.

For self-improvement that works, that is a meaningful upgrade. Memory can still explain how the period felt. The written record tells you what happened.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Write It Down Instead of Trusting Memory. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

Atomic Habits

By James Clear

Rating: 3.5/5 from 7 Google Books ratings

The #1 New York Times bestseller. Over 25 million copies sold! Translated into 60+ languages! Tiny Changes, Remarkable Results No matter...

See on Amazon

Book

The Power of Habit

By Charles Duhigg

Rating: 4.0/5 from 145 Google Books ratings

In The Power of Habit, award-winning business reporter Charles Duhigg takes us to the thrilling edge of scientific discoveries that expla...

See on Amazon

Book

Tiny Habits

By BJ Fogg

Improving your life is much easier than you think. Whether it’s losing weight, sleeping more, or restoring your work/life balance – the s...

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon:Atomic HabitsThe Power of HabitTiny Habits

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

Shop location

UsingUSA USA USAUKCanadaAustraliaIreland

Selected frommotivation poster oneBay.co.uk.

Current eBay listing

Gym Motivation Framed Wall Art Poster Canvas Print Picture

GBP 24.95 | Shipping GBP 4.99NewSeller: jjestoreltd (99.6% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

Motivation Quotes Framed Wall Art Poster Canvas Print Picture

GBP 34.95 | Shipping GBP 4.99NewSeller: jjestoreltd (99.6% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

1% Better Every Day Motivation Framed Wall Art Poster Canvas Print Picture

GBP 24.95 | Shipping GBP 4.99NewSeller: mirrashop2018 (99.8% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Current eBay listing

Tiger Discipline Poster Motivation Framed Wall Art Poster Canvas Print Picture

GBP 24.95 | Shipping GBP 4.99NewSeller: ruppalsingh (99.6% positive)Ships from: GB

View listing on eBay

Browse more oneBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291335719_Does_Monitoring_Goal_Progress_Promote_Goal_Attainment_A_Meta-Analysis_of_the_Experimental_Evidence

2. Source: bmj.com
Link:https://www.bmj.com/content/324/7347/1193

3. Source: researchgate.net
Title: 352542323 The Impact of Goal Enabling Technology on Customer Lifetime Value
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352542323_The_Impact_of_Goal_Enabling_Technology_on_Customer_Lifetime_Value

4. Source: researchgate.net
Title: (PDF) Goals and Psychotherapy Research
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323114345_Goals_and_Psychotherapy_Research

5. Source: researchgate.net
Title: (PDF) What is the Psychological Impact of Self-Weighing? A Meta-Analysis
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289684672_What_is_the_Psychological_Impact_of_Self-Weighing_A_Meta-Analysis

6. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255693188_Findings_from_an_online_behavioural_weight_management_programme_provided_with_or_without_a_fortified_diet_beverage

7. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293440274_Examination_of_Single_Subject_Studies_Conducted_on_Individuals_with_Disabilities_by_Using_Self_Management_Strategies_A_Meta_Analysis_Study

8. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Title: Pub Med Ecological momentary assessment
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18509902/?dopt=Abstract

9. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9163273/

10. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26479070/

Published: February 1, 2016

11. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2588639/

12. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Title: Pub Med Central (PMC)Accelerometry and physical activity questionnaires
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4910242/

13. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3722661/

14. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35719870/

15. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23512568/

16. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6491126/

17. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35264084/

18. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7308800/

19. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3268700/

20. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12838191/

21. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9704370/

22. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6693254/

23. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6926211/

24. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Title: Pub Med Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12689739/

25. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12849610/

26. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12997458/

27. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12853084/

28. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41525703/

29. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41129719/

30. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12480897/

31. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12046261/

32. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11739121/

33. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11655657/

34. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39069082/

35. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11629396/

36. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12490798/

37. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11085043/

38. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11002812/

39. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38560998/

40. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10908591/

41. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12991416/

42. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10116654/

43. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10024875/

44. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9508675/

45. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10511844.1/

46. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9328789/

47. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10290887/

48. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8936478/

49. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8902300/

50. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8663717/

51. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7614249/

52. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10212272/

53. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34546176/

54. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8493454/

55. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8165285/

56. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7970161/

57. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33656451/

58. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33624440/

59. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7661256/

60. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7439658/

61. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6636342/

62. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7294635/

63. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7093696/

64. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32131845/

65. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7571594/

66. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6934919/

67. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7045248/

68. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7254887/

69. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6773318/

70. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6545881/

71. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6604503/

72. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6856872/

73. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6540725/

74. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30843082/

75. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30823873/

76. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6315271/

77. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6296673/

78. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6416703/

79. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30425028/

80. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6122239/

81. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5875102/

82. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28841890/

83. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5434254/

84. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28456347/

85. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28392775/

86. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5282723/

87. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5057493/

88. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4990387/

89. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27586069/

90. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4957914/

91. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27372279/

92. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27306667/

93. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4927444/

94. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4662658/

95. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25965276/

96. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25688807/

97. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25133835/

98. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26209208/

99. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3972382/

100. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3920338/

101. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3354527/

102. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3728167/

103. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3544158/

104. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3533958/

105. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4249763/

106. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3492158/

107. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/3492158/

108. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22340523/

109. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21185970/

110. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21215528/

111. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20205982/

112. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2846437/

113. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3638997/

114. Source: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK55448/

115. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2435095/

116. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2796846/

117. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12016186/

118. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC111114/

119. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1123140/

120. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27670401/

121. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29189034/

122. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27193530/

123. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30335463/

124. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25840521/

125. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26641370/

126. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15235322/

127. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4656225/

128. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14735406/

129. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4781650/

130. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26616119/

131. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4444702/

132. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19204581/

133. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12855344/

134. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12173681/

135. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2769627/

Additional References

136. Source: youtube.com
Title: James Clear’s Analog Habit System Revealed
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w23tM9CxyVQ

137. Source: youtube.com
Title: Methods of Testing in Psychology: Observation, Self-Report, and Experimentation
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DcxL7hhVruk

138. Source: apa.org
Link:https://www.apa.org/contributor?contributor=%22Sheeran%2C+Paschal%22

139. Source: youtube.com
Title: The Fiction of Memory | Elizabeth Loftus
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-zj0czji-A

140. Source: apa.org
Title: Frequently monitoring progress toward goals increases chance of success
Link:https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2015/10/progress-goals?AreaStudy=COMM&Program=CSTC&abtestactive=true

141. Source: youtube.com
Title: How to Bullet Journal
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fm15cmYU0IM

142. Source: youtube.com
Title: Atomic Habits: How to Get 1% Better Every Day
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_nzqnXWvSo