Branchoria Better Habits Better Habits

Evidence-led ways to turn worthwhile intentions into repeatable everyday behaviour.

Within Better Habits

Why Tracking What You Did Changes Results

Recording whether a planned behaviour actually happened can reveal patterns that memory and good intentions often hide.

113 sources 3 graphics
Preview for Why Tracking What You Did Changes Results

On this page

  • What progress monitoring changes
  • What the meta analysis found
  • Keeping tracking simple enough to continue

Introduction

Progress tracking works best when it answers a simple question: did the behaviour you planned actually happen? Memory is a poor substitute. After a busy week, it is easy to remember the two workouts you completed and overlook the three you skipped, or to feel that you have been studying “quite regularly” without knowing whether that means six sessions or two. Recording behaviour turns a vague impression into information that can guide the next decision.

Overview image for Track Progress
Illustrative overview

The strongest broad evidence comes from a meta-analysis of 138 randomised studies involving 19,951 participants. Interventions that deliberately increased monitoring produced better goal attainment, with an average standardised effect of d = 0.40. Importantly, the effect was stronger when people physically recorded their progress or reported it to somebody else.[PubMed]pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govDoes monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence - PubMedFebruary 1, 2016…Published: February 1, 2016

That does not mean elaborate dashboards or obsessive measurement are necessary. The useful part of tracking is the feedback loop: record what happened, compare it with the plan, notice a gap early and adjust what you do next.

What progress monitoring changes

A goal such as “exercise regularly” or “write more” exists partly as a mental standard. To regulate behaviour, however, you need some way of comparing that standard with reality. Models of self-regulation describe progress monitoring as a recurring process: attend to relevant information, update your picture of where you are, compare it with the target and recognise any discrepancy. That discrepancy can then prompt more effort, a change in strategy or, where appropriate, a revision of the goal.[PubMed Central (PMC)]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govPub Med Central (PMC)The neural basis of monitoring goal progressPubMed Central (PMC)The neural basis of monitoring goal progress - PMCSeptember 10, 2014…Published: September 10, 2014

Consider someone who intends to walk for 30 minutes on four weekdays. Without records, Friday’s assessment might be, “I did reasonably well this week.” With four boxes marked Monday to Thursday, the situation is harder to blur: perhaps only Monday and Wednesday happened. The tracker has not supplied motivation by itself. It has supplied accurate feedback while there is still something that can be done about it.

That distinction matters. Tracking is not primarily a way to document success after the fact. It gives a person repeated opportunities to detect a widening gap between intention and action. Researchers studying avoidance of goal information have described an “ostrich problem”: people sometimes avoid information about progress precisely when it is uncomfortable to see. Yet avoiding that information also removes one of the signals that could trigger corrective action.[DOI]doi.orgDOI‘The Ostrich Problem’: Motivated Avoidance or Rejection of Information About Goal Progress - Webb - 2013 - Social and Personality Psyc…

The most useful thing to monitor is therefore usually close to the behaviour you can control. If your goal is to improve fitness, “went for planned walk: yes/no” may be more actionable than continually checking changes in body weight. If you want to write a book, tracking writing sessions or words drafted gives quicker feedback than repeatedly estimating how close you feel to “becoming an author”.

Outcome measures can still be useful, particularly where they genuinely inform decisions. But behavioural tracking answers the question that matters most for follow-through: am I repeatedly doing the thing I said I would do?

Track Progress illustration 1
Explanatory illustration 1

What the meta-analysis found

Benjamin Harkin and colleagues’ 2016 Psychological Bulletin meta-analysis is particularly useful because it did not merely compare people who happened to track themselves with people who did not. It examined randomised interventions designed to increase progress monitoring, and required studies to report both whether monitoring increased and whether goal attainment subsequently changed. Across 138 studies, the interventions produced a very large increase in monitoring frequency, d = 1.98, and a smaller but meaningful improvement in goal attainment, d = 0.40.[PubMed]pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govDoes monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence - PubMedFebruary 1, 2016…Published: February 1, 2016

The analysis also found that increases in monitoring frequency statistically mediated the improvement in goal attainment. In other words, interventions that succeeded in getting people to monitor more tended to produce larger improvements in results. This strengthens the case that monitoring itself matters rather than being an incidental feature of successful programmes.[PubMed]pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govDoes monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence - PubMedFebruary 1, 2016…Published: February 1, 2016

Two moderators are especially practical.

Recording mattered. Effects on goal attainment were larger when people physically recorded the information they obtained from monitoring rather than merely noticing it mentally. A tick on a calendar, an entry in a notebook or an automatically logged step count creates a record that can be revisited. The original researchers suggested several possible explanations, including better encoding and retrieval of progress information, although the moderator analysis cannot by itself establish exactly which mechanism is responsible.[White Rose Research Online]eprints.whiterose.ac.ukWhite Rose Research OnlineDoes Monitoring Goal Progress Promote Goal Attainment? A Meta-Analysis of the Experimental Evidence - White Ros…

Reporting progress mattered too. Monitoring had larger effects when progress was reported or made public rather than kept entirely private. Accountability is one possible explanation: knowing that progress will be reported may increase effort or commitment. But the evidence does not mean everyone needs to broadcast personal goals online. A private weekly check-in with a friend, coach or colleague can also turn an otherwise invisible intention into something that will be revisited.[PubMed]pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govDoes monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence - PubMedFebruary 1, 2016…Published: February 1, 2016

The headline effect should still be interpreted with some restraint. The Harkin meta-analysis found substantial variation between studies, and statistical tests indicated possible small-study or publication-related bias. One adjustment method reduced the estimated goal-attainment effect from d = 0.40 to d = 0.19, although the authors cautioned that such methods can themselves be unreliable when studies are highly heterogeneous. They also noted that much of the evidence concerned health-related behaviour, leaving a thinner base for some other kinds of personal goals.[ResearchGate]researchgate.netOpen source on researchgate.net.

A later meta-review of 66 meta-analyses on self-regulation and health behaviour reached a similarly qualified conclusion. It found support for self-monitoring in several contexts but stressed that behaviour-change techniques were not uniformly successful across all behaviours and populations. It also rated the methodological quality of the Harkin review as limited on several contemporary review criteria, including protocol registration and risk-of-bias reporting.[PubMed Central (PMC)]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govPubMed Central (PMC)Self-Regulation Mechanisms in Health Behaviour Change: A Systematic Meta-Review of Meta-Analyses, 2006–2017 - PMC…

So the sensible reading is not “tracking guarantees success”. It is that deliberately increasing progress monitoring has a reasonably strong experimental evidence base as a way of improving follow-through, while the size of the benefit varies substantially by goal and implementation.

The Science of Setting and Achieving Goals | Emily Balcetis | Knowledge Project Podcast

Channel: The Knowledge Project Podcast

Open on YouTube

Tracking works when it stays connected to action

More measurement is not automatically better. A tracker becomes useful when its information changes what you do.

Suppose someone plans five 30-minute study sessions each week. A practical record might contain only the date and whether the session happened. After several weeks, a pattern may emerge: Tuesday sessions almost always happen, while Friday evening sessions are repeatedly missed. That is more useful than concluding that the person lacks discipline. The record points towards a specific design problem. Friday may be the wrong time, the session may need to move earlier, or the plan may need a smaller fallback version.

Tracking can reveal similar patterns in many ordinary goals:

  • A reading habit repeatedly disappears on days when the book is left in another room.
  • Planned exercise happens on work-from-home days but rarely after a commute.
  • Practice sessions are completed when scheduled before dinner and skipped when left until “later”.
  • Spending limits are exceeded mainly during one particular type of online shopping.
  • A person who believes they are inconsistent discovers that they actually complete their target four days out of five.

The last example matters as much as detecting failure. A record can correct pessimistic memory as well as optimistic memory. Tracking is useful because it replaces a story about your behaviour with a sample of the behaviour itself.

Research in specific domains supports that general principle, although results differ by context. A meta-analysis of 19 randomised interventions involving 2,800 adults found that programmes using self-monitoring reduced sedentary time in the short term; effects were clearer in interventions using objective monitoring tools and those focused specifically on sedentary behaviour.[Springer]link.springer.comOpen source on springer.com. A separate review of interventions for overweight and obese adults found that self-monitoring of behaviour, alongside behavioural goal-setting, was among the techniques associated with stronger short- and long-term intervention effects.[Springer]link.springer.comOpen source on springer.com.

Those findings are useful illustrations rather than proof that one tracking method transfers unchanged to every goal. They reinforce a more modest rule: tracking tends to help when it captures information directly relevant to the action being regulated.

Track Progress illustration 2
Explanatory illustration 2

Keeping tracking simple enough to continue

A theoretically perfect tracker that is abandoned after nine days is not a good tracker. Digital self-monitoring studies repeatedly encounter falling engagement over time. One systematic review of technology-based self-monitoring interventions reported that adherence varied substantially between programmes and declined during the intervention in several studies.[PubMed Central (PMC)]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govOpen source on nih.gov.

Complexity is therefore a cost. If recording a workout requires opening an app, selecting an activity, entering duration, intensity, mood, calories, notes and several ratings, the act of tracking can become a second habit that is harder than the behaviour it is meant to support.

For many self-improvement goals, a useful starting design has only three parts:

  1. Choose one behaviour that clearly counts. “Read for 20 minutes”, “begin the planned study session” or “take the lunchtime walk” is easier to record consistently than “be productive”.
  2. Record it immediately or automatically. Use the simplest durable format available: one tick on paper, one calendar mark, a short spreadsheet entry or reliable automatic measurement.
  3. Review the pattern at a fixed interval. The point of the record is not accumulation. Once or twice a week, ask what repeatedly helped, what repeatedly interfered and what should change.

Technology can reduce friction when it removes manual entry. But there is no general rule that an app is inherently better than paper. In a six-month pilot randomised trial comparing smartphone, website and paper food diaries, all three formats were forms of self-monitoring; the research question was partly whether easier mobile access could improve adherence. The broader lesson is that the medium matters mainly insofar as it makes recording convenient enough to sustain.[PubMed Central (PMC)]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govOpen source on nih.gov.

It is also worth resisting the temptation to track everything simply because software makes it possible. The strongest signal is often binary: planned action completed or not completed. should earn its place by answering a decision-relevant question. If recording when a walk happened reveals that mornings work better than evenings, keep the time field. If a mood rating never affects any decision, it may simply add friction.

TEDxAtlanta - Teresa Amabile - The Progress Principle

Channel: TEDx Talks

Open on YouTube

Use the record to revise the system, not judge yourself

Progress tracking becomes less useful when every missed entry is treated as a verdict. Its practical value is diagnostic.

A run of misses can mean several different things. The cue may be poorly chosen. The behaviour may take too long. The intended time may regularly collide with other responsibilities. The environment may add unnecessary friction. Or the target may simply be unrealistic. Without records, these failures can merge into a general feeling of inconsistency. With records, patterns can be tested.

This is also why occasional failure to track should not trigger the creation of an elaborate “catch-up” record from memory. Retrospective reconstruction defeats much of the purpose. Resume with the next observable behaviour.

There are circumstances in which feedback can also become counterproductive. The literature contains individual studies in which monitoring did not improve the desired outcome and, occasionally, appeared to worsen it. The Harkin review itself was motivated partly by inconsistent earlier findings rather than by uniformly positive studies.[ResearchGate]researchgate.netOpen source on researchgate.net. Feedback that is far below expectations may also encourage disengagement in some circumstances, which is one reason tracking should support adjustment rather than function solely as a repeated signal of failure.[PubMed Central (PMC)]pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.govOpen source on nih.gov.

The practical standard is therefore not “track as much as possible”. It is track enough to make behaviour visible, then use what becomes visible.

Track Progress illustration 3
Explanatory illustration 3

The useful minimum

For an ordinary self-improvement goal, progress monitoring can be remarkably small:

Plan: walk for 25 minutes after lunch on Monday, Wednesday and Friday.

Record: mark one tick immediately after each completed walk.

Review: on Sunday, count completed sessions and look for a pattern in any misses.

Adjust: if Friday repeatedly fails because work runs late, move that session rather than simply renewing the intention to “try harder”.

That tiny system contains the elements supported most clearly by the evidence. Behaviour is made observable. Progress is physically recorded. Results can be reviewed against a concrete target. Repeated failures become information rather than anecdotes, while repeated successes become evidence about what is working.

Progress tracking cannot substitute for a sensible goal, a workable environment or repeated action. Its value is narrower and more useful: it keeps the gap between what you intended to do and what you actually did visible enough to act on. Across a large experimental literature, deliberately strengthening that feedback loop improves the odds that goals turn into behaviour rather than remaining good intentions.[PubMed]pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govDoes monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence - PubMedFebruary 1, 2016…Published: February 1, 2016

Teresa Amabile: Track Your Small Wins to Motivate Big Accomplishments

Channel: 99U

Open on YouTube

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Why Tracking What You Did Changes Results. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

BookCover for Atomic Habits

Atomic Habits

By James Clear

Rating: 3.5/5 from 7 Google Books ratings

The #1 New York Times bestseller. Over 25 million copies sold! Translated into 60+ languages! Tiny Changes, Remarkable Results No matter...

See on Amazon
BookCover for Tiny Habits

Tiny Habits

By BJ Fogg

Improving your life is much easier than you think. Whether it’s losing weight, sleeping more, or restoring your work/life balance – the s...

See on Amazon
BookCover for The Progress Principle

The Progress Principle

By Teresa Amabile, Steven Kramer

Explains how to foster progress, shows how to remove obstacles, including meaningless tasks and toxic relationships that disrupt employee...

See on Amazon
BookCover for The Power of Habit

The Power of Habit

By Charles Duhigg

Rating: 4.0/5 from 145 Google Books ratings

Duhigg takes us to the edge of scientific discoveries that explain why habits exist and how they can be changed. Distilling information i...

See on Amazon
Browse more on Amazon:Atomic HabitsTiny HabitsThe Progress Principle

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

UsingUSA

Selected frommotivation poster oneBay.co.uk.

Browse more oneBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: doi.org
Link:https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12071

Source snippet

DOI‘The Ostrich Problem’: Motivated Avoidance or Rejection of Information About Goal Progress - Webb - 2013 - Social and Personality Psyc...

2. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291335719_Does_Monitoring_Goal_Progress_Promote_Goal_Attainment_A_Meta-Analysis_of_the_Experimental_Evidence

3. Source: link.springer.com
Link:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12966

4. Source: link.springer.com
Link:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12966-017-0494-y

5. Source: link.springer.com
Link:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10389-026-02828-7

6. Source: link.springer.com
Link:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-024-18036-5

7. Source: doi.org
Title: Journal of Medical Internet Research
Link:https://doi.org/10.2196/28874

8. Source: researchgate.net
Title: 352542323 The Impact of Goal Enabling Technology on Customer Lifetime Value
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352542323_The_Impact_of_Goal_Enabling_Technology_on_Customer_Lifetime_Value

9. Source: doi.org
Link:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2019.100283

10. Source: researchgate.net
Title: (PDF) Goals and Psychotherapy Research
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323114345_Goals_and_Psychotherapy_Research

11. Source: doi.org
Title: An experimental test of control theory‐based interventions for [physical activity]({{ ‘physical-capacity/’ | relative_url }})
Link:https://doi.org/10.1111/BJHP.12198

12. Source: researchgate.net
Title: (PDF) What is the Psychological Impact of Self-Weighing? A Meta-Analysis
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289684672_What_is_the_Psychological_Impact_of_Self-Weighing_A_Meta-Analysis

13. Source: doi.org
Link:https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqx048

14. Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Randomisation-of-the-eligible-participants-OBLI-online-basic-lifestyle-information_fig1_255693188

15. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26479070/

Source snippet

Does monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence - PubMedFebruary 1, 2016...

Published: February 1, 2016

16. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Title: Pub Med Central (PMC)The neural basis of monitoring goal progress
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4159987/

Source snippet

PubMed Central (PMC)The neural basis of monitoring goal progress - PMCSeptember 10, 2014...

Published: September 10, 2014

17. Source: eprints.whiterose.ac.uk
Link:https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/91437/

Source snippet

White Rose Research OnlineDoes Monitoring Goal Progress Promote Goal Attainment? A Meta-Analysis of the Experimental Evidence - White Ros...

18. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7571594/

Source snippet

PubMed Central (PMC)Self-Regulation Mechanisms in Health Behaviour Change: A Systematic Meta-Review of Meta-Analyses, 2006–2017 - PMC...

19. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31662031/

20. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6693254/

21. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6926211/

22. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31890630/

23. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3636323/

24. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23587561/

25. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5999061/

26. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12853638/

27. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40385790/

28. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11738617/

29. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39465572/

30. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11085043/

31. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10873991/

32. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9328789/

33. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35089159/

34. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7834932/

35. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32788152/

36. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31662031/?dopt=Abstract

37. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31856664/

38. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7429262/

39. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7254887/

40. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5370453/

41. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5364185/

42. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4846785/

43. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4917920/

44. Source: eprints.whiterose.ac.uk
Link:https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/87431/

45. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25725092/

46. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4266405/

47. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3563396/

48. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3268702/

49. Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2860431/

50. Source: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK55448/

51. Source: eprints.whiterose.ac.uk
Link:https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/75453/

52. Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31973666/

Additional References

53. Source: compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Link:https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/spc3.12071?scrollTo=references

Source snippet

Webb - 2013 - Social and Personality Psychology Compass - Wiley Online Library...

54. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYAe0zXt8xg

Source snippet

Progress tracking goal attainment science The Science of Setting & Achieving Goals...

55. Source: youtube.com
Title: Teresa Amabile: Track Your Small Wins to Motivate Big Accomplishments
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJ0rs9ZENgM

Source snippet

The Science of Setting and Achieving Goals | Emily Balcetis | Knowledge Project Podcast...

56. Source: nature.com
Link:https://www.nature.com/articles/s44401-025-00017-4

57. Source: science.gov
Link:https://www.science.gov/topicpages/k/key%2Bdesign%2Bgoal

58. Source: youtube.com
Title: TEDx Atlanta
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XD6N8bsjOEE

Source snippet

Teresa Amabile: Track Your Small Wins to Motivate Big Accomplishments...

59. Source: youtube.com
Title: Tools for Setting & Achieving Goals | Dr. Emily Balcetis
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YGZZcXqKxE

Source snippet

TEDxAtlanta - Teresa Amabile - The Progress Principle...

60. Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S2291522218001456

61. Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1438887113000708

62. Source: scienceopen.com
Link:https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=73d9c6db-0fac-4a2d-b6fe-b373c2d2d6f0