Within Goals vs Actions
When Should You Learn Before Chasing a Target?
When a task is complex and the right strategy is still unclear, learning what works can matter more than chasing a demanding score.
On this page
- Why hard targets work differently on complex tasks
- What learning goals ask you to improve first
- When to switch from strategy discovery to performance targets
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
When a task is new, complex and strategically unclear, a demanding performance target can arrive too early. The immediate problem is not necessarily insufficient effort; it may be that you do not yet know how to perform well. In that situation, a learning goal — such as identifying effective strategies, mastering a technique or testing different approaches — can be more useful than insisting on a particular score.
This is an important qualification to the familiar finding that specific, difficult goals often improve performance. Research suggests that their benefits weaken when success depends heavily on acquiring knowledge and discovering strategies. Experiments on complex tasks have repeatedly found advantages for learning goals, although the effect is not universal.[sagepub.com]journals.sagepub.comSage JournalsThe Effect of Learning versus Outcome Goals on a Simple versus a Complex Task - Dawn Winters, Gary P. Latham, 1996…
The practical principle is therefore not “avoid ambitious targets”. It is sequence the goals to match the problem: discover what works when the method is uncertain, then demand increasingly strong performance once an effective method is available.
Why hard targets work differently on complex tasks
A performance goal assumes, at least implicitly, that better results can be produced by directing more attention, effort and persistence towards the desired result. If you already know how to perform a task, that can be exactly what is needed. A runner with an established training system, for example, may benefit from a challenging time target because the basic methods are already understood.
A novel complex task presents a different bottleneck. Performance may depend on working out which information matters, which actions should be combined, what sequence works and how the strategy should change when circumstances change. Simply trying harder does not solve those questions. Research on complex-task learning has consequently found that the standard advantage of difficult, specific goals does not generalise straightforwardly from simpler tasks.[ScienceDirect]sciencedirect.comGoal Setting Effects on Implicit and Explicit Learning of Complex Tasks - ScienceDirect…
One of the clearest demonstrations came from Dawn Winters and Gary Latham. In an experiment involving 114 business students, participants performed either a simple or complex scheduling task. On the simple task, an outcome goal produced better performance than being told merely to do their best. On the complex version, however, participants given a learning goal performed significantly better than those given either an outcome goal or a do-your-best instruction. Crucially, the learning-goal group also discovered and used more effective task strategies.[Sage Journals]journals.sagepub.comSage JournalsThe Effect of Learning versus Outcome Goals on a Simple versus a Complex Task - Dawn Winters, Gary P. Latham, 1996…
That last finding helps explain why the distinction matters. A learning goal does not merely replace a stressful number with something easier. It changes where attention is directed. Seijts and Latham describe the appropriate learning goal as one focused on discovering effective strategies or processes when knowledge and skills still need to be acquired.[Academy of Management Journals]journals.aom.orgOpen source on aom.org.
A later complex business-simulation study found the same broad pattern: a specific learning goal produced better performance than either a specific performance goal or a vague goal. Information search and self-efficacy helped explain the learning goal’s effect on performance.[Academy of Management Journals]journals.aom.orgAcademy of Management JournalsGoal Setting and Goal Orientation: An Integration of Two Different Yet Related Literatures | Academy of Man…
This makes the distinction especially relevant to self-improvement. Suppose someone is learning public speaking. “Give an 8/10 presentation” establishes a standard, but a novice may have little idea what changes would produce that score. Early goals such as “test three ways of structuring the opening and compare audience responses” or “learn to deliver the first two minutes without reading from notes” direct effort towards building the capabilities from which later performance can emerge.
What learning goals ask you to improve first
A genuine learning goal concerns acquiring capability, not simply replacing an outcome target with a daily activity. That distinguishes it from a process or behavioural goal based on a strategy that is already known. Recent goal-setting literature explicitly makes this distinction: process goals concern executing existing strategies, whereas learning goals concern acquiring the knowledge and skills needed to perform the task.[ScienceDirect]sciencedirect.comEffect of goal setting, attentional focus, and feedback on resistance training: Stage 1 registered report of a factorial ran…
For a person who does not yet know the best route forward, useful learning goals might therefore ask them to:
- identify several strategies that could improve performance and test them;
- learn a particular technique well enough to use it reliably;
- discover which recurring errors are producing poor results;
- compare two plausible methods using the same feedback measure;
- seek information from stronger performers and extract specific practices to test;
- practise a difficult component separately until its mechanics are understood.
The goal can still be specific and challenging. “Learn more about studying” is vague. “Test retrieval practice and rereading on comparable material this week, then compare what I can recall two days later” gives learning a concrete purpose. Likewise, “become better at sales” says little about what must be discovered; “identify and test three ways of handling the objection that most often ends my calls” creates an observable learning task.
This is consistent with another scheduling experiment involving 96 participants. The task required participants to acquire knowledge in order to perform correctly. A specific, difficult learning goal produced higher performance than a do-your-best instruction, while a specific, difficult outcome goal performed worse than the do-your-best outcome condition. The number of task-relevant strategies participants discovered was positively associated with their performance.[Wiley Online Library]onlinelibrary.wiley.comWiley Online LibraryThe effect of distal learning, outcome, and proximal goals on a moderately complex task - Seijts - 2001 - Journal of…
The same principle has appeared beyond a single experimental design. A meta-analysis of manipulated motivational states found an overall performance advantage for learning over performance goals, while indicating that the advantage may be concentrated in relatively complex tasks.[PubMed]pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govPub Med Performance effects of motivational state: a meta-analysisPerformance effects of motivational state: a meta-analysis - PubMed…
For personal development, that suggests a useful diagnostic question before choosing a demanding metric: Is my main constraint motivation, or is it still method? If you already know what works and are failing to execute it, stronger behavioural commitments or performance targets may be appropriate. If you genuinely do not know which strategy works, measuring yourself relentlessly against an outcome does little to fill the knowledge gap.
Premature targets can compete with strategy discovery
The problem with an early performance target is not simply that failure feels discouraging. Complex tasks consume attention. During early skill acquisition, the learner has to understand the task while simultaneously trying to perform it. A demanding result can direct scarce attention towards the performance gap precisely when that attention is needed for experimentation, information search and strategy formation.
DeShon and Alexander’s experiments on complex learning help qualify the mechanism. Difficult specific goals did not automatically improve performance when learning was implicit, whereas when complex-task processing was explicit, goal setting was associated with gradual performance improvements and the development of better strategies. Their results suggest that “complexity” is not a magic label that makes performance goals ineffective; how the task can be learned and how strategy development occurs also matter.[ScienceDirect]sciencedirect.comGoal Setting Effects on Implicit and Explicit Learning of Complex Tasks - ScienceDirect…
There are further reasons not to turn the learning-goal finding into another universal rule. In a study of 84 four-person teams using a complex command-and-control simulation, specific learning goals actually produced worse team performance than general learning goals or specific performance goals. The researchers attributed the pattern to impaired team coordination, and greater task complexity amplified the disadvantage of the specific learning goals.[ScienceDirect]sciencedirect.comOpen source on sciencedirect.com.
Nor has every novice-training experiment detected the expected advantage. A study of 48 medical and physician-assistant students learning laparoscopic tasks compared proficiency-based performance goals with learning goals and found no significant difference in overall task scores. The authors noted the small sample and limited practice period among the study’s constraints.[PubMed]pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govOpen source on nih.gov.
These exceptions matter because the practical lesson is narrower than “learning goals always beat performance goals”. The evidence supports using learning goals particularly when an individual’s central obstacle is acquiring task-relevant knowledge or strategies. Team coordination, the way goals are framed, existing ability and the nature of the task can change the result. Research has even found that higher cognitive ability can alter the relative benefit of performance and learning goals on a moderately complex task.[ResearchGate]researchgate.netOpen source on researchgate.net.
When should you learn before chasing a target?
A learning-first phase is most defensible when several conditions occur together: the task is unfamiliar, performance depends on multiple interacting decisions, you cannot yet explain a reliable method for succeeding, feedback repeatedly reveals problems whose causes you do not understand, or additional effort using the current method is producing little improvement.
Consider studying for a difficult examination. A target such as “score 85%” remains useful as an eventual destination. But if a student has never learnt how to study the material effectively, the immediate controllable problem is not the percentage. A learning phase might involve discovering which types of questions expose gaps in understanding, practising retrieval rather than merely rereading, and identifying why particular errors recur. Once those methods are understood, daily behaviours can implement them and practice-test scores can become increasingly useful performance targets.
The same reasoning applies to a new professional skill. Someone learning data analysis may initially gain more from completing small analyses using several methods, comparing their errors and learning how to validate results than from demanding that every task be completed within a fixed time. A strict speed target becomes more informative after the basic workflow is reliable.
This also explains why a disappointing outcome does not always mean the target should simply be lowered. If performance is poor because the strategy is inadequate, an easier version of the same performance target leaves the underlying problem untouched. The more useful response may be to temporarily change the object of the goal — from producing a result to discovering how that result can reliably be produced.
When to switch from strategy discovery to performance targets
Learning goals should not become a permanent refuge from measurable performance. Their purpose is to build the knowledge and strategies that make stronger performance possible. Once that bottleneck has substantially changed, the goal should change with it.
The transition is appropriate when you can describe a credible strategy, execute its important components with reasonable consistency, diagnose common errors and use feedback to make corrections. At that point, the task increasingly becomes one of applying and refining known skills rather than discovering the fundamentals from scratch.
The switch need not be abrupt. A useful progression is:
- Discovery: “Identify and test three approaches that could solve this recurring problem.”
- Skill acquisition: “Practise the most promising approach until I can execute its critical steps reliably.”
- Controlled application: “Use that approach on five realistic tasks and record where it fails.”
- Performance: “Complete the task to the agreed quality standard within 40 minutes.”
This sequence preserves ambition while putting it in the right place. Evidence from a University of Waterloo experiment on a high-complexity task supports the logic of sequencing: assigning performance goals only after learning goals had induced learning produced better performance than learning goals alone in that study. The same research also found that simultaneous learning and performance goals could improve performance without harming learning, suggesting that the boundary between phases need not always be rigid.[UWSpace]uwspace.uwaterloo.caOpen source on uwaterloo.ca.
Performance measures can remain visible during the learning phase as feedback rather than the immediate demand. A novice runner can record pace without making every training session a test of the desired race time. A student can take practice examinations without treating every mark as the day’s primary objective. The outcome shows whether learning is transferring into results; the learning goal determines what to work on while the route to improvement remains uncertain.
That distinction connects learning goals directly to controllable daily behaviours. Early in a difficult pursuit, the most useful daily behaviour may be experimentation, deliberate practice, information seeking or error analysis. Once those activities reveal a dependable strategy, the emphasis can move towards consistent execution and increasingly demanding performance standards.
The resulting approach is more precise than either “focus only on the process” or “always set ambitious goals”. Ask what the task currently requires from you. When the method is known, a challenging target can concentrate effort. When the method is still being discovered, make learning itself the target — and use what you learn to earn the right to demand more from your performance.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to When Should You Learn Before Chasing a Target?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
Atomic Habits
Rating: 3.5/5 from 7 Google Books ratings
The #1 New York Times bestseller. Over 25 million copies sold! Translated into 60+ languages! Tiny Changes, Remarkable Results No matter...
Peak
For the first time in decades of groundbreaking research, the inventor of the 10,000-hour rule explains his techniques for developing mas...
Make It Stick
The international bestseller that has helped millions of students, teachers, and lifelong learners use proven approaches to learn better...
Range
The #1 New York Times bestseller that has all America talking: as seen/heard on CNN's Fareed Zakaria GPS, Morning Joe, CBS This Morning,...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected frommotivational poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597896900023
Source snippet
Goal Setting Effects on Implicit and Explicit Learning of Complex Tasks - ScienceDirect...
2.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1469029225002055
Source snippet
Effect of goal setting, attentional focus, and feedback on resistance training: Stage 1 registered report of a factorial ran...
3.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.70
Source snippet
Wiley Online LibraryThe effect of distal learning, outcome, and proximal goals on a moderately complex task - Seijts - 2001 - Journal of...
4.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/job.70
Source snippet
Wiley Online LibraryThe effect of distal learning, outcome, and proximal goals on a moderately complex task - Seijts - 2001 - Journal of...
5.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597813000423
6.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1931720415002536
7.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226687931_The_combined_effects_of_goal_type_and_cognitive_ability_on_performance
8.
Source: nature.com
Link:https://www.nature.com/articles/s44271-026-00408-9
9.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sdr.1559
10.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1931720415002160
11.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: The effect of priming learning vs. performance goals on a complex task
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0749597814000508
12.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475212000382
13.
Source: researchgate.net
Title: (PDF) Learning goals: A qualitative and quantitative review
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281228193_Learning_goals_A_qualitative_and_quantitative_review
14.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Knowing when to set learning versus performance goals
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090261611000751
15.
Source: asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Title: j.1365 2923.2011.04015.x
Link:https://asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04015.x
16.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251288701_How_Incentive_Contracts_and_Task_Complexity_Influence_and_Facilitate_Long-Term_Performance
17.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Goal setting, evaluation, learning and revision: A dynamic modeling approach
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0149718905000923
18.
Source: researchgate.net
Title: (PDF) Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11152729Building_a_practically_useful_theory_of_goal_setting_and_task_motivation-_A_35-year_odyssey
19.
Source: researchgate.net
Title: (PDF) Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254734316_Building_a_Practically_Useful_Theory_of_Goal_Setting_and_Task_Motivation
20.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-1379%28199907%2920%3A4%3C421%3A%3AAID-JOB896%3E3.0.CO%3B2-%23
21.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-1379%28199907%2920%3A4%3C421%3A%3AAID-JOB896%3E3.0.CO%3B2-%23
22.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238333801_The_Effect_of_Learning_versus_Outcome_Goals_on_a_Simple_versus_a_Complex_Task
23.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.4030110104
24.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Goal Setting Effects on Implicit and Explicit Learning of Complex Tasks
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0749597896900023
25.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Challenge versus threat effects on the goal–performance relationship
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597802000043
26.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Goal Setting Theory
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/social-sciences/goal-setting-theory
27.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Goal Setting Effects on Implicit and Explicit Learning of Complex Tasks
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597896900023/pdf?md5=0b4857da7084b3298a9401ec7c61e74e&pid=1-s2.0-S0749597896900023-main.pdf
28.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131510002940
29.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563208002215
30.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563218304618
31.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0749597813000423
32.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Goal orientation and performance adaptation: A meta-analysis
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0092656618302447
33.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0361476X12000057
34.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Goal setting, evaluation, learning and revision: A dynamic modeling approach
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718905000923
35.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X11000063
36.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597803001146
37.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Developmental changes in children’s choices of practice strategies
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475222000469
38.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Phases of learning: How skill acquisition impacts cognitive processing
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010028515300657
39.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Title: Developing a skill acquisition framework for youth sport in Singapore
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667239122000077
40.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227031563_Goal-performance_relations_The_effects_of_initial_task_complexity_and_task_practice
41.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284621413_Learning_versus_performance_goals_When_should_each_be_used
42.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320609499_Goal_Setting_and_Goal_Orientation_An_Integration_of_Two_Different_yet_Related_Literatures
43.
Source: researchgate.net
Title: 256923996 Knowing when to set learning versus performance goals
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256923996_Knowing_when_to_set_learning_versus_performance_goals
44.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232593812_The_Effects_of_Learning_Goal_Difficulty_Level_and_Cognitive_Ability_on_Performance
45.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254734316_Building_a_Practically_Useful_Theory_of_Goal_Setting_and_Task_Motivation_A_35Year_Odyssey
46.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280081888_Task_Complexity_as_a_Moderator_of_Goal_Effects_A_Meta-Analysis
47.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247399303_New_Developments_in_and_Directions_for_Goal-Setting_Research
48.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232487412_The_Effects_of_Behavioural_Outcome_Goals_Learning_Goals_and_Urging_People_to_do_Their_Best_on_an_Individual%27s_Teamwork_Behaviour_in_a_Group_Problem-Solving_Task
49.
Source: journals.sagepub.com
Link:https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1059601196212007
Source snippet
Sage JournalsThe Effect of Learning versus Outcome Goals on a Simple versus a Complex Task - Dawn Winters, Gary P. Latham, 1996...
50.
Source: journals.aom.org
Link:https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/ame.2005.15841964
51.
Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12237980/
Source snippet
Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey - PubMed...
52.
Source: journals.aom.org
Link:https://journals.aom.org/doi/pdf/10.5465/20159574
Source snippet
Academy of Management JournalsGoal Setting and Goal Orientation: An Integration of Two Different Yet Related Literatures | Academy of Man...
53.
Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Title: Pub Med Performance effects of motivational state: a meta-analysis
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15647124/
Source snippet
Performance effects of motivational state: a meta-analysis - PubMed...
54.
Source: journals.sagepub.com
Title: Sage Journals Performance Effects of Motivational State: A Meta-Analysis
Link:https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1207/s15327957pspr0102_4
Source snippet
Sage JournalsPerformance Effects of Motivational State: A Meta-Analysis - Christopher H. Utman, 1997...
55.
Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26597731/
56.
Source: uwspace.uwaterloo.ca
Link:https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/items/776665d9-fbb6-4f7f-afae-a884e788b49e
57.
Source: doi.org
Link:https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2021.1901298
58.
Source: doi.org
Link:https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12239
59.
Source: uwspace.uwaterloo.ca
Link:https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/items/776665d9-fbb6-4f7f-afae-a884e788b49e/full
60.
Source: journals.aom.org
Link:https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/255381
61.
Source: journals.aom.org
Link:https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/ambpp.2016.11095abstract
62.
Source: doi.org
Link:https://doi.org/10.5465/20159574
63.
Source: journals.sagepub.com
Link:https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1548051816641874
64.
Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3974764/
65.
Source: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3615041/
66.
Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21848715/
67.
Source: journals.aom.org
Link:https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/ame.2005.15841964
68.
Source: journals.aom.org
Link:https://journals.aom.org/doi/pdf/10.5465/ame.2005.15841964
69.
Source: doi.org
Link:https://doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-1379%28199907%2920%3A4%3C421%3A%3AAID-JOB896%3E3.0.CO%3B2-%23
70.
Source: journals.sagepub.com
Link:https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1059601196212007
71.
Source: journals.aom.org
Link:https://journals.aom.org/doi/pdf/10.5465/255381?download=true
72.
Source: journals.sagepub.com
Link:https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1059601196212007
73.
Source: journals.sagepub.com
Link:https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/154193120204601211
74.
Source: journals.sagepub.com
Title: j.1467 8721.2006.00449.x
Link:https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00449.x
75.
Source: doi.org
Link:https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000127
76.
Source: doi.org
Title: New Directions in Goal-Setting Theory
Link:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00449.x
77.
Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14498789/
78.
Source: uwaterloo.ca
Link:https://uwaterloo.ca/ctr-sustainability-performance-management/working-smarter-and-working-harder-combining-learning-and
79.
Source: openurl.ebsco.com
Link:https://openurl.ebsco.com/results?bquery=AU+Latham%2C+Gary+P.&link_origin=&searchDescription=Latham%2C+Gary+P.&sid=ebsco%3Aocu%3Arecord
Additional References
80.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Goal Setting Theory Explained: Locke & Latham’s 5 Principles
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIIbnb_DZhw
Source snippet
Learning goals vs performance goals Locke Latham What are the Strengths and Weaknesses of Locke and Latham's Goal Setting Theory?...
81.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Why Most Goals Fail (and How to Set Goals That Actually Stick)
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydCM-rV6Ag4
Source snippet
Goal Setting Theory Explained: Locke & Latham's 5 Principles...
82.
Source: tandfonline.com
Link:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15327043hup0804_1
83.
Source: sportsessionplanner.com
Link:https://www.sportsessionplanner.com/s/JgqUi/Switching-Play.html?interface=en
84.
Source: frontiersin.org
Link:https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1511605/full
85.
Source: tandfonline.com
Link:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1750984X.2021.1901298
86.
Source: tandfonline.com
Link:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1750984X.2022.2116723
87.
Source: tandfonline.com
Link:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17437199.2019.1706616
88.
Source: tandfonline.com
Link:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21520704.2026.2662222
89.
Source: apa.org
Link:https://www.apa.org/ed/schools/teaching-learning/top-twenty/creative-talented/motivation